The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##还可以,主要还是涉及民族身份认同,其他一笔掠过。讲身份认同的溯源和演变还有thymos蛮有意思的。讲到的ethnolinguistics和身份认同引起些相关思考。
评分##一度在好像有点道理和皱眉之间横跳,更多的时候就纯粹是一种索然无味 也许是政治学的stroke对读惯了更nuanced的人类学的taste来说有点太粗了 言必从gj,可行性层面谈论问题,感觉在听西方zf内部辩论 读完这个想去读点graeber缓缓,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割线) 看完reversing roe滚回来加星????♀️ 残酷的世道面前有什么理想主义可言 dystopia里面讨论什么utopia 每个人都能有块遮羞布地活下去就不错了
评分##很值得一看
评分##能用阶级矛盾解释的问题 披上身份的外皮
评分##fukuyama 近作。以dignity/ identity 的角度出发讨论了世界最近发生的问题- 左翼力量的下降/女权运动/伊斯兰极端主义/民粹民族主义/individualism等等。广却不深。可以作为知识积累的一本书,通俗好读,案例丰富 ,可以安利做闲暇阅读。
评分##只能算是他想要搞清的问题的第一章。追溯身份的政治哲学起源,最终联系起个人与政治的关系,而当代民主制度也由此诞生。但人们其实没有在尊严上达成共识。因为它寄托于道德实践中,也就成了它既是表象又是问题根源的复杂性,而背后施加影响的是社会。上升到国家层面之后,他在认可其必要星的同时揭示了时代背景下身份政治产生的四个问题。我想身份政治其实是不幸沦为贫富分化的一个cry baby了,吸引了过多的注意力。所以福山表扬了奥巴马医保,可惜医保又遭遇身份政治的反噬。如何改善?他提出要构建新的国家身份,不以狭义个体的自然属性或宗教方向来界定的(听起来也挺危险,理论搞不好就会像他说的赫尔曼和他的老师亨廷顿了)。他的一份药方是公共教育。PS,我爱他提及了神话和科幻作品,我在想美学教育是不是药方里的一味成分?
评分##用这个逻辑是不是也能justify,democracy是某锅中产或受高等教育liberal寻求thymos的工具,过度挑战nationalism话语对底层群众不利?
评分##很值得一看
评分##用“身份政治”来解释HK废青暴动,倒是很贴切。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等,本站所有链接都为正版商品购买链接。
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有