Getting in is only half the battle. The Privileged Poor reveals how―and why―disadvantaged students struggle at elite colleges, and explains what schools can do differently if these students are to thrive.
The Ivy League looks different than it used to. College presidents and deans of admission have opened their doors―and their coffers―to support a more diverse student body. But is it enough just to admit these students? In The Privileged Poor, Anthony Jack reveals that the struggles of less privileged students continue long after they’ve arrived on campus. Admission, they quickly learn, is not the same as acceptance. This bracing and necessary book documents how university policies and cultures can exacerbate preexisting inequalities and reveals why these policies hit some students harder than others.
Despite their lofty aspirations, top colleges hedge their bets by recruiting their new diversity largely from the same old sources, admitting scores of lower-income black, Latino, and white undergraduates from elite private high schools like Exeter and Andover. These students approach campus life very differently from students who attended local, and typically troubled, public high schools and are often left to flounder on their own. Drawing on interviews with dozens of undergraduates at one of America’s most famous colleges and on his own experiences as one of the privileged poor, Jack describes the lives poor students bring with them and shows how powerfully background affects their chances of success.
If we truly want our top colleges to be engines of opportunity, university policies and campus cultures will have to change. Jack provides concrete advice to help schools reduce these hidden disadvantages―advice we cannot afford to ignore.
##主要提出了poor students大类里有细分的privileged poor的概念。这些privileged poor因为高中时期进入了更为精英和高层的环境,在进入精英大学之后与peer和校里的adults沟通会更游刃有余,相较于doubly disadvantaged来说。但他们仍旧摆脱不了贫穷带来的物质上的障碍。其中第二章关于与老师、admin staff的交互让人十分能relate。对于doubly disadvantaged来说,是否真的应该宁做鸡头,不做凤尾呢?
评分##很喜欢作者对于工薪甚至贫困阶层的孩子在精英大学生活的探讨,话说作者本科就读的Amherst College 就在母校旁边,每次去都能感受到扑面而来的中上层白人精英主义的气息... 最欣赏的片段莫过于doubly disadvantaged的学生对于office hour的恐惧和对于教授的deferrance. 想着自己本科刚来某文理学院的时候常常震惊于周围美国同学和教授在办公室自如地分享八卦,而我却在担心她会不会占用了宝贵的office hour时间,不敢和教授聊学术之外的生活,生怕浪费了他们的时间。还好感谢本科的导师们,都went out of their way to help, 也算某种程度上弥补了学生们自身社会阶级的cultural capital的gap吧
评分##上个月Dr. Jack 来学校的时候见到了本人,也见到了Vanessa现身说法,说这本书改变了她的人生。书本身不是没有问题,比如他自己承认的只关注了African Americans和latinos两个种族,其他群体被直接忽略,但是更多还是积极的内容。The stories of marginalized groups need to be told.
评分##作者是穷学生出身,成为学者之后研究穷学生怎样能更好适应精英大学的生活,以求让更多的穷学生像他一样成功实现阶级跃迁,真的很empowering。本书很好读,作者很有逻辑地把学生的testimony串起来了。"Access is not inclusion"。第三章真是令人震惊,鼓励穷学生做宿舍清洁工来赚钱这种政策太智障了,还好有作者这种学者让弱势群体得以发声,就这点就值得力荐。本书结论不是鼓励更多穷学生读私校成为privileged poor,而是鼓励更多公校能赋权。最后的attachments也很有意思,作者留白了很多值得研究的地方,比如亚裔完全不在研究样本里。从社达社会出来的学生的cultural shock和美国穷学生居然是差不多的,比如我看到office hours那一点感到很有共鸣。
评分##文字没的说。第三章作为留学生读着读着也很容易共情。第二章看到一个特别像我自己做TA的一个例子,有点愤怒。决定放进本科生intro syllabus
评分##就讲讲故事。没什么洞见。
评分##整本书都在翻来覆去地打苦情牌,所以是怎样,让读者给你水滴筹啊?
评分##浅尝辄止,有点可惜。
评分##3星半其实 现在美国这种书籍有一个普遍毛病就是写作很散 而且后面比较重复 不过他给出的视角非常值得参考。我知道会有人认为让寒门子弟半工半读是”天将降大任“,但不能忽视的是现代人心理健康的重要性。这个问题是恶毒”凤凰男“和”做题家“的一体两面。给他们超越原生家庭的机会,而不是居高临下认为自己施舍了高等教育的机会,是非常重要的。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等,本站所有链接都为正版商品购买链接。
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有