Getting in is only half the battle. The Privileged Poor reveals how―and why―disadvantaged students struggle at elite colleges, and explains what schools can do differently if these students are to thrive.
The Ivy League looks different than it used to. College presidents and deans of admission have opened their doors―and their coffers―to support a more diverse student body. But is it enough just to admit these students? In The Privileged Poor, Anthony Jack reveals that the struggles of less privileged students continue long after they’ve arrived on campus. Admission, they quickly learn, is not the same as acceptance. This bracing and necessary book documents how university policies and cultures can exacerbate preexisting inequalities and reveals why these policies hit some students harder than others.
Despite their lofty aspirations, top colleges hedge their bets by recruiting their new diversity largely from the same old sources, admitting scores of lower-income black, Latino, and white undergraduates from elite private high schools like Exeter and Andover. These students approach campus life very differently from students who attended local, and typically troubled, public high schools and are often left to flounder on their own. Drawing on interviews with dozens of undergraduates at one of America’s most famous colleges and on his own experiences as one of the privileged poor, Jack describes the lives poor students bring with them and shows how powerfully background affects their chances of success.
If we truly want our top colleges to be engines of opportunity, university policies and campus cultures will have to change. Jack provides concrete advice to help schools reduce these hidden disadvantages―advice we cannot afford to ignore.
##内容翔实 观点清晰 研究方法也不错
评分##主要提出了poor students大类里有细分的privileged poor的概念。这些privileged poor因为高中时期进入了更为精英和高层的环境,在进入精英大学之后与peer和校里的adults沟通会更游刃有余,相较于doubly disadvantaged来说。但他们仍旧摆脱不了贫穷带来的物质上的障碍。其中第二章关于与老师、admin staff的交互让人十分能relate。对于doubly disadvantaged来说,是否真的应该宁做鸡头,不做凤尾呢?
评分##文字没的说。第三章作为留学生读着读着也很容易共情。第二章看到一个特别像我自己做TA的一个例子,有点愤怒。决定放进本科生intro syllabus
评分从一个很具体的人群切入,通过三组在精英大学来自不同阶级背景的学生的比较,非常具体又条理清楚的看到现在的学校制度下,贫困学生所经历的困境。很多意在帮助他们的措施也可能是进一步强化差异,没有考虑到心理层面带给学生的感受。阶级和教育题材书籍中的又一块砖。
评分##内容翔实 观点清晰 研究方法也不错
评分##接着paying for the party 往后写了一下好学校里的穷学生,一种比较幸运,通过各种项目在寄宿学校积累过一轮人力和文化资本,一种实惨,费劲来了以后各种文化冲击。有的时候觉得社会生活太复杂了,即使是穷人也会被同一个社会的不同项目给分裂成几个小群体,产生不一样的体验(作者顺嘴提了一下群体之间对于同一件事不同的道德界限)。观察一下,其实在留学生里也常见,只不过parachute kids吸引了更多的媒体注意力。终于,美国人终于意识到diversity不仅仅是肤色意义上的representative,也能注意到阶级伤害是真实的存在了。
评分##浅尝辄止,有点可惜。
评分##去听book talk的时候觉得心都碎了。看的时候就反正也心情沉重,还是蛮容易共情double disadvantaged and privileged poor两个贫困学生群体在精英学校面临的各种结构性困境,PP学生因为在私校积累了文化资本能更好地熟练运用institutional resources(office hour, networking, seeking help, at ease with the rich), 但面临金钱相关问题时PP和DD一样无力:spring break famine, 做学生清洁员感受到的区隔和领免费文化活动票时隔开的队伍,一样触目惊心和让人愤怒。也很喜欢Jack写方法memo时候提到没想到强度很高的访谈对他自己来说感情上也非常有挑战。
评分##3星半其实 现在美国这种书籍有一个普遍毛病就是写作很散 而且后面比较重复 不过他给出的视角非常值得参考。我知道会有人认为让寒门子弟半工半读是”天将降大任“,但不能忽视的是现代人心理健康的重要性。这个问题是恶毒”凤凰男“和”做题家“的一体两面。给他们超越原生家庭的机会,而不是居高临下认为自己施舍了高等教育的机会,是非常重要的。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等,本站所有链接都为正版商品购买链接。
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有