An international and historical look at how parenting choices change in the face of economic inequality
Parents everywhere want their children to be happy and do well. Yet how parents seek to achieve this ambition varies enormously. For instance, American and Chinese parents are increasingly authoritative and authoritarian, whereas Scandinavian parents tend to be more permissive. Why? Love, Money, and Parenting investigates how economic forces and growing inequality shape how parents raise their children. From medieval times to the present, and from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden to China and Japan, Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti look at how economic incentives and constraints--such as money, knowledge, and time--influence parenting practices and what is considered good parenting in different countries.
Through personal anecdotes and original research, Doepke and Zilibotti show that in countries with increasing economic inequality, such as the United States, parents push harder to ensure their children have a path to security and success. Economics has transformed the hands-off parenting of the 1960s and '70s into a frantic, overscheduled activity. Growing inequality has also resulted in an increasing "parenting gap" between richer and poorer families, raising the disturbing prospect of diminished social mobility and fewer opportunities for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. In nations with less economic inequality, such as Sweden, the stakes are less high, and social mobility is not under threat. Doepke and Zilibotti discuss how investments in early childhood development and the design of education systems factor into the parenting equation, and how economics can help shape policies that will contribute to the ideal of equal opportunity for all.
Love, Money, and Parenting presents an engrossing look at the economics of the family in the modern world.
##Economic forces play an important role of shaping the parenting style. The intensive parenting prevails today as a result of rising economic inequality and higher return on education.
评分随便看看吧。主要就是说,由于各国的经济政策这些年的变化,以及贫富差距加大,世界范围内,家长管的都越来越加强孩子的教育。intensive和permissive parenting各有利弊,每家对hardworking,independence,creativity的看重程度不同而已哈。 看完后个人认为既然孩子在中国,还是萝卜加大棒都要有,模仿瑞典芬兰的permissive parenting不具备人家的社会背景,tiger mom式教育挺符合我国国情的。
评分##资本逻辑下分析的各国育娃状况细致有理,但分析终究是提出问题,这样的教育不平等的矛盾状况却似乎是没有解法
评分##鸡娃的出现是因为教育回报率过高... which may be the result of rising inequality,不拿高学历找不到好工作,高学历和低学历之间的工资差距太大辽... makes sense,北欧不鸡,美国有一丢丢鸡,中国很鸡娃(海淀娃首当其冲) 所以又一次经济学帝国主义...现有的教育方式在经济上可能是(符合国情的)内生出来的最优解... 全文比较好玩儿的也就是前面的描述性分析...实际上没啥识别(identification)
评分##inequality --> helicopter parents
评分##经济学的视角梳理了育儿观念,生育意愿的历史变迁。这些看似主观的决定,也脱不了所处的时代背景。也不免让人好奇:作为个体,是顺应时代的大多数还是依从自己意愿对子女更好呢?
评分##刚读到第一章,特别有启发。推荐所有准备当父母,已经当父母和当过父母的人。这本书同时也加深了我对现在社会中不平等现象的忧虑。读完后再给大家报告。谢谢
评分随便看看吧。主要就是说,由于各国的经济政策这些年的变化,以及贫富差距加大,世界范围内,家长管的都越来越加强孩子的教育。intensive和permissive parenting各有利弊,每家对hardworking,independence,creativity的看重程度不同而已哈。 看完后个人认为既然孩子在中国,还是萝卜加大棒都要有,模仿瑞典芬兰的permissive parenting不具备人家的社会背景,tiger mom式教育挺符合我国国情的。
评分##鸡娃的出现是因为教育回报率过高... which may be the result of rising inequality,不拿高学历找不到好工作,高学历和低学历之间的工资差距太大辽... makes sense,北欧不鸡,美国有一丢丢鸡,中国很鸡娃(海淀娃首当其冲) 所以又一次经济学帝国主义...现有的教育方式在经济上可能是(符合国情的)内生出来的最优解... 全文比较好玩儿的也就是前面的描述性分析...实际上没啥识别(identification)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等,本站所有链接都为正版商品购买链接。
© 2025 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有