What are the consequences if the people given control over our government have no idea how it works?
"The election happened," remembers Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, then deputy secretary of the Department of Energy. "And then there was radio silence." Across all departments, similar stories were playing out: Trump appointees were few and far between; those that did show up were shockingly uninformed about the functions of their new workplace. Some even threw away the briefing books that had been prepared for them.
Michael Lewis’s brilliant narrative takes us into the engine rooms of a government under attack by its own leaders. In Agriculture the funding of vital programs like food stamps and school lunches is being slashed. The Commerce Department may not have enough staff to conduct the 2020 Census properly. Over at Energy, where international nuclear risk is managed, it’s not clear there will be enough inspectors to track and locate black market uranium before terrorists do.
Willful ignorance plays a role in these looming disasters. If your ambition is to maximize short-term gains without regard to the long-term cost, you are better off not knowing those costs. If you want to preserve your personal immunity to the hard problems, it’s better never to really understand those problems. There is upside to ignorance, and downside to knowledge. Knowledge makes life messier. It makes it a bit more difficult for a person who wishes to shrink the world to a worldview.
If there are dangerous fools in this book, there are also heroes, unsung, of course. They are the linchpins of the system―those public servants whose knowledge, dedication, and proactivity keep the machinery running. Michael Lewis finds them, and he asks them what keeps them up at night.
##可讀性很強
評分##主旨是批判建國同誌缺乏行政管理能力,大量篇幅是介紹美國很多政府部門都是做什麼的。包括商業部,能源部,農業部… 打個岔,我國對農業數據氣象數據的分析和使用,是不是還沒有開始?
評分##作為世界上最龐大也最強大的機構,美國政府的隱患如何産生自內部。就像科幻/文革裏人類自毀裝置被打開瞭,第一章可謂步步驚心,完全可以當成政治懸疑來看,隻不過書裏所講的事情是真的。後幾章節奏略有鬆弛,不然可以給五星
評分##有點意思
評分##語音書到手,罵川普的,也就這本值得一讀。雖然有流水賬之嫌,不過,作者呈現的黯淡現實真讓理想主義者寒心。嫌內容少的讀者有些吹毛求疵,川普去年初就職,作者在一年多時間完成采訪撰寫,寫瞭三個主要部門的問題,已經很不易瞭。為敘述風格加一星,顯然為瞭中期選舉匆忙完成的。錶麵上反對川普,實際批判這種造就川普的政治環境和那些無視或無知於政府職能的選民們。即使共和黨失去多數地位,風險長期存在,美國的政治氣氛和意識形態纔是問題癥結所在,川普隻是開始。
評分##有點散的流水賬,中心思想不過是it's the risks that we fail to imagine that get us killed,扯上特朗普豈不是格局小瞭?
評分##有點散的流水賬,中心思想不過是it's the risks that we fail to imagine that get us killed,扯上特朗普豈不是格局小瞭?
評分##結構比較鬆散 花樣黑Trump 故事本身還都是頗值得一讀的
評分##感覺,寫跟金融不相關的的有點看不下去…當然題材還是不錯的,我們不知道的風險纔是最緻命的,