Five Essays on Liberty
Introduction
Political Ideas in the Twentieth Century
Historical Inevitability
Two Concepts of Liberty
John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life
From Hope and Fear Set Free
Other Writings on Liberty
Liberty
The Birth of Greek Individualism
Final Retrospect
Autobiographical Appendices
The Purpose Justifies the Ways
A Letter to George Kennan
Notes on Prejudice
Berlin and his Critics by Ian Harris
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
具体描述
Liberty is a revised and expanded edition of the book that Isaiah Berlin regarded as his most important—Four Essays on Liberty, a standard text of liberalism, constantly in demand and constantly discussed since it was first published in 1969. Writing in Harper's, Irving Howe described it as "an exhilarating performance—this, one tells oneself, is what the life of the mind can be."
Berlin's editor Henry Hardy has revised the text, incorporating a fifth essay that Berlin himself had wanted to include. He has also added further pieces that bear on the same topic, so that Berlin's principal statements on liberty are at last available together in one volume. Finally, in an extended preface and in appendices drawn from Berlin's unpublished writings, he exhibits some of the biographical sources of Berlin's lifelong preoccupation with liberalism. These additions help us to grasp the nature of Berlin's "inner citadel," as he called it—the core of personal conviction from which some of his most influential writing sprung.
用户评价
##Practical Philanthropy
评分##因为哲学课读的书越来越看不懂/不感兴趣了所以我决定每本下面编些不相干的胡话，整理的时候就感觉好像自己真有收获一样。水手需要预测暴风雨的时候，会跑到甲板上用鼻子吸一吸，再不济就伸舌头尝一尝，吉兆是仍然咸涩的海风，凶兆是坏血病梦境般温柔甜蜜的鲜橙味。
评分##书果然得多读几遍。其实很多话都是重复，就是把一句话换一种方式再说一遍，不过这样对读者很友好。伯林的论述中有个有意思的问题：自然科学方法论与形而上学看起来是对手，然而就这么联手了~
评分##伯林是个思想史的好老师，是少有的会像演讲稿一样安排内容的思想史作者，总是清晰地告诉读者他要讨论的是什么问题。最爱的一篇是The Birth of Greek Individualism. 前面的编辑手记一定要读，非常赞!
评分昨天和刘擎老师就本书第39页里面的一段话争论了一下午，结果发现，我们使用的是不同的版本，而且不同版本之间有不少出入。后来，我致信伯林文集编辑Henry Hardy。他告诉我，重印本会不断纠正前面版本的错误，以下是他发给我的纠正目录：http://t.cn/RlluUU7 @2017-11-08 15:24:33
评分##Although Sir Isaiah Berlin has shown his apparent indifference to values in history, such as freedom and justice, and holds a superficial attitude towards values' conflict, still he displays the outstanding taste of a Classic liberalist——a writing style of prudent and fluent, and most important, explicit sightseeing and distinction.
评分##2006年写毕业论文竟然参考过，估计是纯粹装逼，八成都没读吧
评分##其实 Berlin 说，Two Concepts 那篇文章，主要是历史性的辨析，而非哲学性的辨析。
评分##按柏林，古希腊的个人主义显于公元前4-3世纪拐角。但是令人困惑的问题是，从柏拉图到芝诺等人的转变过程中，到底发生了什么。虽然柏林讨论着古希腊个人主义，但他引用的却是罗斯托夫采夫等人，而非古朗士与格罗兹。后者从城邦内部社会生活的变化中，讨论了个人主义是如何在城邦兴起的。至于结尾以贵族抱怨城邦生活为例，实际上有些不适合。雅典内部纷争是从梭伦时期就一直蛰伏着，而公元前5世纪下叶以降的战争，损耗的正是富裕阶层。日益趋平化的社会图景，对于往昔富裕者而言，如若无法通过政治获取权力与声望，那么以巧妙的方式回归自我，似乎是很直接的选择。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等，本站所有链接都为正版商品购买链接。
© 2025 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有