Trade disputes are usually understood as conflicts between countries with competing national interests, but as Matthew C. Klein and Michael Pettis show, they are often the unexpected result of domestic political choices to serve the interests of the rich at the expense of workers and ordinary retirees. Klein and Pettis trace the origins of today’s trade wars to decisions made by politicians and business leaders in China, Europe, and the United States over the past thirty years. Across the world, the rich have prospered while workers can no longer afford to buy what they produce, have lost their jobs, or have been forced into higher levels of debt. In this thought‑provoking challenge to mainstream views, the authors provide a cohesive narrative that shows how the class wars of rising inequality are a threat to the global economy and international peace—and what we can do about it.
##Kindle
評分##the distribution of purchasing power within a society affects its economic relations with the rest of the world.
評分##Kindle
評分##Kindle
評分##曆史蠻詳實的,國際貿易入門書
評分##Kindle
評分##"Despite these moves toward liberalization, the end of the war failed to restore trade to its pre-1929, much less pre-1913, importance. In fact, crossborder flows of goods and services relative to global output would not return to the zenith reached in the 1870s until the 1970s." Shocked me.
評分##3.5星吧,一開始講國際貿易、資本流動、産業升級的邏輯和變遷部分言簡意賅很好,能夠提及一部分資本主義國傢內部的階級矛盾也很好,但核心問題是:1 政經不分傢,隻強調經濟邏輯不解釋背後的邏輯,無異於攻乎異端 2 世界範圍內的不平等一字不提,導緻企圖實現的平衡依然是基於不平等和剝削的而非進步的和共贏的 3 提齣的解決方案異想天開。可以說,講矛盾的同一性和鬥爭性不錯,但強調瞭矛盾的特殊性而沒有找到矛盾的普遍性,另外主要矛盾抓得不好,導緻對矛盾中的對抗理解不深刻,歸根結底是缺乏唯物辯證的世界觀。
評分##普選製的特點就是不管貧富懸殊是人都有一票,所以哪怕全球資本已經是讓一批美國人先富起來瞭,還是要轉過身哄好這批被時代拋棄的同胞,反正是那幫民主黨人、邪惡帝國在搞火。美式愚民,啞然失笑。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有