By the winner of the 1988 Nobel Prize in Economics, an essential and paradigm-altering framework for understanding economic development--for both rich and poor--in the twenty-first century.
Freedom, Sen argues, is both the end and most efficient means of sustaining economic life and the key to securing the general welfare of the world's entire population. Releasing the idea of individual freedom from association with any particular historical, intellectual, political, or religious tradition, Sen clearly demonstrates its current applicability and possibilities. In the new global economy, where, despite unprecedented increases in overall opulence, the contemporary world denies elementary freedoms to vast numbers--perhaps even the majority of people--he concludes, it is still possible to practically and optimistically restain a sense of social accountability. Development as Freedom is essential reading.
##森博士論述自由的經典書目,可是到目前為止那麼多國傢(特彆是撒哈拉以南國傢)的發展似乎都在證明以‘發展途徑的自由’為中心的發展並沒有帶來自由,那麼在缺乏‘兩個基本點’前提下的這個中心價值何在?
評分##可是更多的時候覺得他在迴避問題,例如提到自由是目標也是手段,提到自由是衡量發展的標準,可就是沒有正麵迴答當隻能二選一的時候也怎麼辦,而且也沒有在宏觀層麵的自由與微觀層麵的自由做齣明顯區分......可在講到 how much money can take us to immortality 的時候真覺得被戳中瞭....
評分##one of the assigned books from the class. i'm not convinced at all... but there may will be an equivocal way of answer or something i dont get like always
評分##less critical than expected
評分##可是更多的時候覺得他在迴避問題,例如提到自由是目標也是手段,提到自由是衡量發展的標準,可就是沒有正麵迴答當隻能二選一的時候也怎麼辦,而且也沒有在宏觀層麵的自由與微觀層麵的自由做齣明顯區分......可在講到 how much money can take us to immortality 的時候真覺得被戳中瞭....
評分##ch1,2.
評分##ch1,2.
評分以自由看待發展並不是自由主義的宣言。這書在西方自有它對話的語境,可惜跑到中國以後隻剩下一句“民主是一種普世價值”瞭。嘆。
評分以自由看待發展並不是自由主義的宣言。這書在西方自有它對話的語境,可惜跑到中國以後隻剩下一句“民主是一種普世價值”瞭。嘆。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有