By the winner of the 1988 Nobel Prize in Economics, an essential and paradigm-altering framework for understanding economic development--for both rich and poor--in the twenty-first century.
Freedom, Sen argues, is both the end and most efficient means of sustaining economic life and the key to securing the general welfare of the world's entire population. Releasing the idea of individual freedom from association with any particular historical, intellectual, political, or religious tradition, Sen clearly demonstrates its current applicability and possibilities. In the new global economy, where, despite unprecedented increases in overall opulence, the contemporary world denies elementary freedoms to vast numbers--perhaps even the majority of people--he concludes, it is still possible to practically and optimistically restain a sense of social accountability. Development as Freedom is essential reading.
##作者帶著對大眾自覺、政治權謀、公共討論等等的美好假想,把倫理和經濟揉在一起 -_-!! 這書在發展研究的崇高學術地位。。果真是源自政治需要麼; freedom as the main end of development <-- capability approach; mujun的評論值得看http://book.douban.com/review/1514284/
評分##現在想想這本書的地位可能是與政治發展聯係的
評分##很好的一本書,讀完之後對於政治學、經濟學、公共政策、還有政治哲學,都有很大的幫助!
評分##喜歡嚴謹的論述
評分##喜歡嚴謹的論述
評分##可是更多的時候覺得他在迴避問題,例如提到自由是目標也是手段,提到自由是衡量發展的標準,可就是沒有正麵迴答當隻能二選一的時候也怎麼辦,而且也沒有在宏觀層麵的自由與微觀層麵的自由做齣明顯區分......可在講到 how much money can take us to immortality 的時候真覺得被戳中瞭....
評分##可是更多的時候覺得他在迴避問題,例如提到自由是目標也是手段,提到自由是衡量發展的標準,可就是沒有正麵迴答當隻能二選一的時候也怎麼辦,而且也沒有在宏觀層麵的自由與微觀層麵的自由做齣明顯區分......可在講到 how much money can take us to immortality 的時候真覺得被戳中瞭....
評分以自由看待發展並不是自由主義的宣言。這書在西方自有它對話的語境,可惜跑到中國以後隻剩下一句“民主是一種普世價值”瞭。嘆。
評分##作者帶著對大眾自覺、政治權謀、公共討論等等的美好假想,把倫理和經濟揉在一起 -_-!! 這書在發展研究的崇高學術地位。。果真是源自政治需要麼; freedom as the main end of development <-- capability approach; mujun的評論值得看http://book.douban.com/review/1514284/
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有