Along with plan and elevation, section is one of the essential representational techniques of architectural design; among architects and educators, debates about a project's section are common and often intense. Until now, however, there has been no framework to describe or evaluate it. Manual of Section fills this void.
Paul Lewis, Marc Tsurumaki, and David J. Lewis have developed seven categories of section, revealed in structures ranging from simple one-story buildings to complex structures featuring stacked forms, fantastical shapes, internal holes, inclines, sheared planes, nested forms, or combinations thereof. To illustrate these categories, the authors construct sixty-three intricately detailed cross-section perspective drawings of built projects—many of the most significant structures in international architecture from the last one hundred years—based on extensive archival research. Manual of Section also includes smart and accessible essays on the history and uses of section.
##看得很爽
評分##圖還是不錯的,但此書基於建築剖麵類型迴推瞭建築的生成手法,這非常容易誤導人。這種簡單粗暴的分類方法,在越當代的建築中越缺乏說服力,因為它們的生成邏輯完全是另外一套語言。剖麵,不管是作為錶達還是作為設計工具,在應對當代建築的復雜性時的軟弱無力暴露無遺。
評分##經典
評分##清晰易懂且實用,但有它的局限性。分類方式顯得略略簡單粗暴,可以幫助初學者。但畢竟隻是建築的一個切片。另,看瞭以後覺得,過瞭一百年,現代建築的內部空間並沒有什麼劃時代的進步。
評分##提問Paul 可不可以從剖麵著手設計,paul說可以不過你要3d建模。題外話,美國人太容易執著於一件事,拿齣來反復研究說,二維section 的復雜程度,figure ground 的抽象關係,對此西紮,卒姆托等的建築體驗可以啪啪打臉。
評分##看到後麵覺得前麵的分類好扯且並不能指導設計…它是對結果進行分析而不是研究生成的齣發點…比如incline是從流綫齣發(古根海姆)還是塑形;不過作為操作手法的reference 圖贊一下…
評分##這本書還用多言嗎,section齣圖參考no.1,隻管它作為如何錶達內部空間和結構就好瞭,至於分類太基於直觀的形式瞭。
評分##看得很爽
評分##內容還行 就是裝幀讓人看不見中間 為什麼有跨頁不蝴蝶裝?????
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有