具体描述
This extended essay by one of the world's leading historians seeks, in its first part, to excavate, and to vindicate, the neo-Roman theory of free citizens and free states as it developed in early-modern Britain. This analysis leads on to a powerful defence of the nature, purposes and goals of intellectual history and the history of ideas. As Quentin Skinner says, 'the intellectual historian can help us to appreciate how far the values embodied in our present way of life, and our present ways of thinking about those values, reflect a series of choices made at different times between different possible worlds'. This essay thus provides one of the most substantial statements yet made about the importance, relevance and potential excitement of this form of historical enquiry. Liberty before Liberalism is based on Quentin Skinner's Inaugural Lecture as Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge, delivered in November 1997. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
用户评价
应该早点读。
评分应该早点读。
评分##大四下读的。
评分##最近写的论文是从批评斯金纳的一个研究开始的，不过跟polit哲学史没关系，对这个话题感兴趣，就找来看了。读斯金纳的确不会失望，想给十颗星。研究弥尔顿的文学批评家也都应该读读。这本书也是英文学术写作的典范。
评分##Namier-Butterfield-Pocock的史学史问题随处可见，“自由”问题则明显展露出Berlin观念的过量溢出。颇受前代影响的学术关怀，也许才是Skinner总是抛弃处于显著地位的清教-神学论争，而换之以所谓“新罗马”的真实原因。
评分##最近写的论文是从批评斯金纳的一个研究开始的，不过跟polit哲学史没关系，对这个话题感兴趣，就找来看了。读斯金纳的确不会失望，想给十颗星。研究弥尔顿的文学批评家也都应该读读。这本书也是英文学术写作的典范。
评分##Skinner从不让人失望
评分##为什么写英文的不能都像斯金纳这样写大白话？
评分##大四下读的。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等，本站所有链接都为正版商品购买链接。
© 2025 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有