具體描述
One bright spring morning in London, Diana Cowper – the wealthy mother of a famous actor - enters a funeral parlor. She is there to plan her own service.
Six hours later she is found dead, strangled with a curtain cord in her own home.
Enter disgraced police detective Daniel Hawthorne, a brilliant, eccentric investigator who’s as quick with an insult as he is to crack a case. Hawthorne needs a ghost writer to document his life; a Watson to his Holmes. He chooses Anthony Horowitz.
Drawn in against his will, Horowitz soon finds himself a the center of a story he cannot control. Hawthorne is brusque, temperamental and annoying but even so his latest case with its many twists and turns proves irresistible. The writer and the detective form an unusual partnership. At the same time, it soon becomes clear that Hawthorne is hiding some dark secrets of his own.
用戶評價
###2020ReadingChallenge01AmateurDetective 核心詭計平淡瞭一點但整本書有種whimsical的機智。希望寫成係列啊，新時代的watson和sherlock。
評分##:(
評分##因為上一本Magpie Murders，作者今年的新書剛一齣來就迫不及待想看瞭。和上一部作品一樣的是，Horowitz 的crime fiction 給人耳目一新的感覺，總會留下很“機智”的印象。挺喜歡找到很有個人特色的作者。
評分###2020ReadingChallenge01AmateurDetective 核心詭計平淡瞭一點但整本書有種whimsical的機智。希望寫成係列啊，新時代的watson和sherlock。
評分##齣於對Magpie Murders的喜愛讀完瞭這本，結果遠不如前者啊。為瞭消減本格案件置身當代倫敦的違和感，同樣是在敘述手法上玩花樣，喜鵲是用“作中作”，這係列看來是打算一路走“元小說”風。案件本身中規中矩，red herring是常規套路，凶手時間綫那塊明顯玩脫瞭，最後認凶的大場麵也不夠份量。唯一的亮點大概是散落書中的所有真實人物，斯皮爾伯格和丁丁曆險記那段怎麼看怎麼像發自肺腑的吐槽。
評分##有些地方還蠻阿婆的；敘事比案件更有趣，也比較難得遇到地理和文化的reference都能看懂的書2333
評分##過分無聊瞭。前兩百四十頁幾乎是全程傢訪...而這裏麵還包含瞭一看就是為瞭進行傢訪纔寫的誤導，以及一堆廢話裏藏幾個莎士比亞梗的所謂伏綫。哦和喜鵲一樣有人名和字謎梗，勉強可以當冷笑話看的那種。總之不推薦在這種書上浪費時間。ps：拜托有幾個正常讀者會願意聽作者聊丁丁曆險記或者斯皮爾伯格彼得傑剋遜什麼的（看到這裏我很絕望），灌水就灌水扯什麼小說構架＆日本讀者的審美徹底理解不能。
評分##齣於對Magpie Murders的喜愛讀完瞭這本，結果遠不如前者啊。為瞭消減本格案件置身當代倫敦的違和感，同樣是在敘述手法上玩花樣，喜鵲是用“作中作”，這係列看來是打算一路走“元小說”風。案件本身中規中矩，red herring是常規套路，凶手時間綫那塊明顯玩脫瞭，最後認凶的大場麵也不夠份量。唯一的亮點大概是散落書中的所有真實人物，斯皮爾伯格和丁丁曆險記那段怎麼看怎麼像發自肺腑的吐槽。
評分##:(
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有