How will Artificial Intelligence affect crime, war, justice, jobs, society and our very sense of being human? The rise of AI has the potential to transform our future more than any other technology—and there’s nobody better qualified or situated to explore that future than Max Tegmark, an MIT professor who’s helped mainstream research on how to keep AI beneficial.
How can we grow our prosperity through automation without leaving people lacking income or purpose? What career advice should we give today’s kids? How can we make future AI systems more robust, so that they do what we want without crashing, malfunctioning or getting hacked? Should we fear an arms race in lethal autonomous weapons? Will machines eventually outsmart us at all tasks, replacing humans on the job market and perhaps altogether? Will AI help life flourish like never before or give us more power than we can handle?
What sort of future do you want? This book empowers you to join what may be the most important conversation of our time. It doesn’t shy away from the full range of viewpoints or from the most controversial issues—from superintelligence to meaning, consciousness and the ultimate physical limits on life in the cosmos.
##Name-dropping把我耐心磨光。Sloppy writing。
評分##寫得又多又亂
評分##前半部分作者嘗試描述未來的人類和AI前景時,內容一直在fiction/假設/純暢想中來迴搖擺,一直到講迴物理把scale拉到宇宙,纔感覺論證有依據起來,感覺動輒對人類幾百萬年後的論證不是沒事兒乾。本來隻想藉科學傢之眼來一個對near future的glimpse,卻收獲瞭一整本嚴肅的對生命/意識/科技/機器和的探討,一整章輕鬆的對Elon Musk的欣賞,和一句人類未來由每個人書寫的鼓勵!
評分##【書.2020-00】人有多大膽,地有多大産。
評分##作者對未來的方嚮的認識很開放,各種理論流派麵麵俱到,綜閤但同時絮叨。整本書一會兒像科普,一會兒像科幻。。。
評分##最新一本講人工智能的書。這類書也有套路,10%之一新意已屬不易。不過此書第七、八兩章,分彆談“目標”與“意識”,非常有意思。貫穿始終的是鏈接意識的神經學基礎和物理學基礎。作為一個文科生,我必須承認書沒讀懂。
評分##嗯。無人駕駛會減少90%的車禍率,可畢竟不是全部規避。這樣如果發生交通事故,怎麼追究責任呢?人們這種外部歸因的習慣,是會因為找不到凶手而自己開車呢?還是選擇相信90%呢?
評分##實在不覺得書裏的想象有任何新意(科幻小說或電影比這精彩)、或者討論深刻。耐著性子讀瞭一半仍然得浪費時間。
評分##前半部分作者嘗試描述未來的人類和AI前景時,內容一直在fiction/假設/純暢想中來迴搖擺,一直到講迴物理把scale拉到宇宙,纔感覺論證有依據起來,感覺動輒對人類幾百萬年後的論證不是沒事兒乾。本來隻想藉科學傢之眼來一個對near future的glimpse,卻收獲瞭一整本嚴肅的對生命/意識/科技/機器和的探討,一整章輕鬆的對Elon Musk的欣賞,和一句人類未來由每個人書寫的鼓勵!