Daniel Markovits is Guido Calabresi Professor of Law at Yale Law School and founding director of the Center for the Study of Private Law.
A revolutionary new argument from eminent Yale Law professor Daniel Markovits attacking the false promise of meritocracy It is an axiom of American life that advantage should be earned through ability and effort. Even as the country divides itself at every turn, the meritocratic ideal - that social and economic rewards should follow achievement rather than breeding - reigns supreme. Both Democrats and Republicans insistently repeat meritocratic notions. Meritocracy cuts to the heart of who we are. It sustains the American dream. But what if, both up and down the social ladder, meritocracy is a sham? Today, meritocracy has become exactly what it was conceived to resist: a mechanism for the concentration and dynastic transmission of wealth and privilege across generations. Upward mobility has become a fantasy, and the embattled middle classes are now more likely to sink into the working poor than to rise into the professional elite. At the same time, meritocracy now ensnares even those who manage to claw their way to the top, requiring rich adults to work with crushing intensity, exploiting their expensive educations in order to extract a return. All this is not the result of deviations or retreats from meritocracy but rather stems directly from meritocracy's successes. This is the radical argument that Daniel Markovits prosecutes with rare force. Markovits is well placed to expose the sham of meritocracy. Having spent his life at elite universities, he knows from the inside the corrosive system we are trapped within. Markovits also knows that, if we understand that meritocratic inequality produces near-universal harm, we can cure it. When The Meritocracy Trap reveals the inner workings of the meritocratic machine, it also illuminates the first steps outward, towards a new world that might once again afford dignity and prosperity to the American people.
##也许有知识社会学的读法:What is conventionally called merit is actually an ideological conceit, constructed to launder a fundamentally unjust allocation of advantage. 作者分析了精英化对学术场域的影响,很贴近我的感受,之前也看到推上几个经济学教授在争论。
评分 评分##关于今天的inequality以及直接反应出的trump这样的人当选, 有大量的讨论。Dr. Markovits 归因到唯材论。主要的支撑是1. 唯材论导致高级工种需要的特殊精英教育以及专长使得高级工种的pay异常的高,同时挤压普通中产工种的存在性;2.唯材论依靠的考评体系导致精英教育的分化以...
评分 评分##也许有知识社会学的读法:What is conventionally called merit is actually an ideological conceit, constructed to launder a fundamentally unjust allocation of advantage. 作者分析了精英化对学术场域的影响,很贴近我的感受,之前也看到推上几个经济学教授在争论。
评分##没有新的论据。政策建议看p.277上两句话写清楚的就行了。
评分##浏览了下,想法不新颖,然后法律系教授分析东西还是表面。建议多看看社会学对Merit的系统性批判。。。
评分##没有新的论据。政策建议看p.277上两句话写清楚的就行了。
评分##浏览了下,想法不新颖,然后法律系教授分析东西还是表面。建议多看看社会学对Merit的系统性批判。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有