##以bible作為起點,一切強調從最初原始狀態開始,私人財産的概念和定義確實牛逼,但Locke自始至終都在假設和現實社會間的現象和邏輯中徘徊不定。之後對政府職責的定義和劃分,實在覺得Locke和Hobbes殊途同歸
評分##Locke阿應該好好讀阿
評分##Beautifully written and clear points.with a weird sense of humor.
評分##王建勛老師強迫我們讀原版的著作 簡直tall big up!
評分##看完寫完synopsis要喜極而泣瞭! 這種政治/哲學書為什麼都不通俗 像小說一樣多好 簡潔condense什麼的最討厭瞭!== 其實作為那個時代的人 能寫成這樣 然後成為重要的理論之一(奠基也能說過去?) 是很不錯的
評分##If i had been interested in taking this book as a foundation to expand my own ideas on, I would have enjoyed it much better..but since i've been going through my intellectual sloth lately and was looking for a carefully-argued system, I wasn't that intrigued. or perhaps if i had read his treatise on human understanding, this would've been convincin
評分##Locke阿應該好好讀阿
評分##在勛哥的課堂上用一個學期的時間討論完瞭這本書。如果單從文本來看,英文自是沒有嚼透,但是課堂上的討論,卻讓我收獲良多,也算是將我帶入瞭政治哲學的領域吧。
評分##introduction to classical liberalism. lockean social contract: the optimistic version of hobbes' leviathan, as far as I'm concerned...
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有