具體描述
Every novelist's work contains an implicit vision of the history of the novel, an idea of what the novel is. I have tried to express here the idea of the novel that is inherent in my own novels.
-- Milan Kundera Kundera brilliantly examines the work of such important and diverse figures as Rabelais, Cervantes, Sterne, Diderot, Flaubert, Tolstoy, and Musil. He is especially penetrating on Hermann Broch, and his exploration of the world of Kafka's novels vividly reveals the comic terror of Kafka's bureaucratized universe. Kundera's discussion of his own work includes his views on the role of historical events in fiction, the meaning of action, and the creation of character in the post-psychological novel.
用戶評價
##Concentrated. Lucid. If I'd read the book in my undergraduate study, I might have been a literature graduate. As great as Noam Chomsky's Syntactic Structure and George Lakoff's Metaphors We live By.
評分##What the novel alone can discover: man's being.
評分##Writing novels is an art that unfolds the meaning of life in a seemingly insouciant world. Great novels surpass time and transmit the weight of history to the following generation. Though the term polyphony is not unfamiliar in literary studies, I am still amazed to see how Kundera faithfully structures his novel based on the composition of music.
評分##昆德拉對卡夫卡十分推崇Part 5, What is the Kafkan? 貫穿整本書的對於卡夫卡的評價及分析十分精妙。 文學和音樂的結構對比。 對於novel作為一種整閤narrative，lyrical and philosophy的一種藝術形式有非常精彩的論述。 “Modern stupidity means not ignorance but the nonthought of received ideas.”
評分##很有意思誒 昆德拉對小說的很多思考和評價對我來說還是很新穎的 而且讀完以後有一種豁然開朗的感覺
評分昆德拉的文論居然寫得這麼好，以及、可以看得齣來他對卡夫卡學者的意見真是蠻大的…
評分##這是我讀得最痛苦的英文書......
評分##很有意思誒 昆德拉對小說的很多思考和評價對我來說還是很新穎的 而且讀完以後有一種豁然開朗的感覺
評分##3.5 正統、嚴肅、博學、自信，昆德拉自封為三百年les temps modernes的繼承者。喜歡他寫的故事，喜歡他的理論，但不太喜歡他，a huge halo deceptively unaware of itself。也許是因為，作為一個小人物，與一個曆史傳承者生活在同一個時代而感到彆扭吧，沒法打心底認同這種legitimacy。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有