Sherry Turkle is the Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor of the Social Studies of Science and Technology at MIT. She is frequently interviewed in Time, Newsweek, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal, on NBC News, and more. She lives in Boston, Massachusetts.
Consider Facebookit’s human contact, only easier to engage with and easier to avoid. Developing technology promises closeness. Sometimes it delivers, but much of our modern life leaves us less connected with people and more connected to simulations of them. In Alone Together , MIT technology and society professor Sherry Turkle explores the power of our new tools and toys to dramatically alter our social lives. It’s a nuanced exploration of what we are looking forand sacrificingin a world of electronic companions and social networking tools, and an argument that, despite the hand-waving of today’s self-described prophets of the future, it will be the next generation who will chart the path between isolation and connectivity.
##那兩個故事簡直講得就是災難.既然要說明的是digital culture和人類與機器的關係,切入的角度就十分錯誤. 2010年鞦,我來到瞭坐落於查爾斯河畔的麻省理工學院,開始瞭在這裏的研究和走讀。 來到波士頓的第一個周末,我就有些迫不及待地來到位於波士頓近郊康科德鎮的瓦爾登湖。鞦色中的瓦爾登湖,油畫般濃墨重彩的樹影倒映在碧藍的湖麵上。清晨的湖邊,寂靜得清澈,有節奏地...
評分##昨晚正好看瞭機械姬。。。感覺就是psychopath的變種啊,書主要觀點還是人找機器人做伴侶是因為they'd rather live disappointed than to be disappointed. 沒挑戰那多沒意思嘛
評分##網絡時代的哲學,一些打動我的句子摘抄如下: 我們似乎一直緻力於賦予物體以人性特質,同時卻滿足於用物化的方法看待彼此。 "感覺很好"本身不是黃金法則,一個人可以因為糟糕的原因而"感覺很好"。 愛情意味著從對方的視角品嘗人世間的驚喜與艱辛,由雙方共同的經曆體驗悲傷和喜...
評分##via 馬修, 火車上讀的。
評分 評分##1. AIBO一類都還不算AI的robot畢竟隻是addition而不是substitution的存在。2. Turkle延續瞭幾年前的思路,試圖從relational artifact的角度而不是intrinsic property的角度來思考科技or even AI。那麼問題來瞭,如此distinction真的站得住腳麼?Turkle對relational artifact的擔憂恰恰是來自於科技某些intrinsic property的缺失。
評分##計算機專業的也可以瞅瞅
評分 評分##實在是堅持不下去瞭。。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 windowsfront.com All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有