What was cinema in modern China? It was, this book tells us, a dynamic entity, not strictly tied to one media technology, one mode of operation, or one system of aesthetic code. It was, in Weihong Bao’s term, an affective medium, a distinct notion of the medium as mediating environment with the power to stir passions, frame perception, and mold experience. In Fiery Cinema, Bao traces the permutations of this affective medium from the early through the mid-twentieth century, exploring its role in aesthetics, politics, and social institutions.
Mapping the changing identity of cinema in China in relation to Republican-era print media, theatrical performance, radio broadcasting, television, and architecture, Bao has created an archaeology of Chinese media culture. Within this context, she grounds the question of spectatorial affect and media technology in China’s experience of mechanized warfare, colonial modernity, and the shaping of the public into consumers, national citizens, and a revolutionary collective subject. Carrying on a close conversation with transnational media theory and history, she teases out the tension and affinity between vernacular, political modernist, and propagandistic articulations of mass culture in China’s varied participation in modernity.
Fiery Cinema advances a radical rethinking of affect and medium as a key insight into the relationship of cinema to the public sphere and the making of the masses. By centering media politics in her inquiry of the forgotten future of cinema, Bao makes a major intervention into the theory and history of media.
##写得影史三城记,借得烈火一缕魂。
评分##重写中国电影史和媒介史。低调,扎实,漂亮。
评分##A very solid study
评分##英语一般
评分##I spent nearly two months reading this book, which inspired my study of early Chinese film history because my field is focusing on Left-wing film culture and Wartime Chongqing. Professor Bao is an excellent, intellectual, and talented scholar whose study encouraging me to do better in the future.
评分##陪伴我开始电影史研究的案头书,写不同章节不断地读,终于有机会一次读完。本书关注电影与其他媒介互动的跨媒介视角,以及突破白话现代主义概念忽略政治维度,提出政治现代主义——左翼的透明美学与抗战时期重庆的宣传理论的尝试,确为电影史研究打开了广阔的视角。但是affective medium关联自然、物质、社会、感官多个层面,这样的理论架构会不会太过开阔,乃至于在丰富诠释之外缺乏内在的连贯性?
评分##I spent nearly two months reading this book, which inspired my study of early Chinese film history because my field is focusing on Left-wing film culture and Wartime Chongqing. Professor Bao is an excellent, intellectual, and talented scholar whose study encouraging me to do better in the future.
评分##"Left-wing culture of glass"
评分##重写中国电影史和媒介史。低调,扎实,漂亮。