☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁



點擊這裡下載

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價

---

編輯推薦

　　首版內容介紹瞭宇宙本性最前沿的知識。微觀和宏觀世界觀測技術領域方麵10年來的進展證明瞭霍金教授的許多理論預言。他為瞭把觀測的新知識介紹給讀者，重寫瞭前言，全麵更新瞭原版的內容，並新增瞭一章有關蟲洞和時間旅行的激動人心的課題。

內容簡介

#1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER

A landmark volume in science writing by one of the great minds of our time, Stephen Hawking’s book explores such profound questions as: How did the universe begin—and what made its start possible? Does time always flow forward? Is the universe unending—or are there boundaries? Are there other dimensions in space? What will happen when it all ends?

Told in language we all can understand, A Brief History of Time plunges into the exotic realms of black holes and quarks, of antimatter and “arrows of time,” of the big bang and a bigger God—where the possibilities are wondrous and unexpected. With exciting images and profound imagination, Stephen Hawking brings us closer to the ultimate secrets at the very heart of creation.

　　　 本書是“推動叢書”輯的一種。 時間有初始嗎？它又將在何地終結呢？宇宙是無限的還是有限的？ 霍金教授遨遊到外層空間奇異領域，對遙遠星係、黑洞、誇剋、大統一理論、“帶味”粒子和“自鏇”粒子、反物質、“時間箭頭”等進行瞭深入探討--其齣乎意外的含義引起瞭人們的極大興趣。他揭示瞭當日益膨脹的宇宙崩潰時，時間倒溯引起人們不安的可能性，那時宇宙分裂成11維空間，一種“沒有邊界”的宇宙理論可能取代大爆炸理論和上帝，上帝--也許曾是造萬物時主要推動者，也會因這些新發現而日漸範圍變窄。　　
　　 《時間簡史》對我們這些喜用言語錶達甚於方程式錶達的讀者而言是一本裏程碑式的佳書。她齣於一個對人類思想有傑齣貢獻者之手，這是一本對知識無限追求之作，是對時空本質之謎不懈探討之作。

作者簡介

Stephen Hawking is Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge; his other books for the general reader include A Briefer History of Time, Black Holes and Baby Universes and The Universe in a Nutshell.　

　　 史蒂芬·霍金（Stephen W.Hawking），1942年齣生於伽利略逝世的三百周年紀念日。他現任劍橋大學盧卡斯數學教授（一度曾為牛頓所任），並廣被尊崇為繼愛因斯坦以來傑齣的理論物理學傢。

精彩書評

“[Hawking] can explain the complexities of cosmological physics with an engaging combination of clarity and wit. . . . His is a brain of extraordinary power.”— The New York Review of Books

“This book marries a child’s wonder to a genius’s intellect. We journey into Hawking’s universe while marvelling at his mind.”— The Sunday Times (London)

“Masterful.”— The Wall Street Journal

“Charming and lucid . . . [A book of] sunny brilliance.”— The New Yorker

“Lively and provocative . . . Mr. Hawking clearly possesses a natural teacher’s gifts—easy, good-natured humor and an ability to illustrate highly complex propositions with analogies plucked from daily life.”— The New York Times

“Even as he sits helpless in his wheelchair, his mind seems to soar ever more brilliantly across the vastness of space and time to unlock the secrets of the universe.”— Time

前言/序言

Chapter One
Our picture of the universe

A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the center of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy. At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: “What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.” The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, “What is the tortoise standing on?” “You’re very clever, young man, very clever,” said the old lady. “But it’s turtles all the way down!”

Most people would find the picture of our universe as an infinite tower of tortoises rather ridiculous, but why do we think we know better? What do we know about the universe, and how do we know it? Where did the universe come from, and where is it going? Did the universe have a beginning, and if so, what happened before then? What is the nature of time? Will it ever come to an end? Can we go back in time? Recent breakthroughs in physics, made possible in part by fantastic new technologies, suggest answers to some of these longstanding questions. Someday these answers may seem as obvious to us as the earth orbiting the sun–or perhaps as ridiculous as a tower of tortoises. Only time (whatever that may be) will tell.

As long ago as 340 B.C. the Greek philosopher Aristotle, in his book On the Heavens, was able to put forward two good arguments for believing that the earth was a round sphere rather than a flat plate. First, he realized that eclipses of the moon were caused by the earth coming between the sun and the moon. The earth’s shadow on the moon was always round, which would be true only if the earth was spherical. If the earth had been a flat disk, the shadow would have elongated and elliptical, unless the eclipse always occurred at a time when the sun was directly under the center of the disk. Second, the Greeks knew from their travels that the North Star appeared lower in the sky when viewed in the south than it did in more northerly regions. (Since the North Star lies over the North Pole, it appears to be directly above an observer at the North Pole, but to someone looking from the equator, it appears to lie just at the horizon. From the difference in the apparent position of the North Star in Egypt and Greece, Aristotle even quoted an estimate that the distance around the earth was 400,000 stadia. It is not known exactly what length a stadium was, but it may have been about 200 yards, which would make Aristotle’s estimate about twice the currently accepted figure. The Greeks even had a third argument that the earth must be round, for why else does one first see the sails of a ship coming over the horizon, and only later see the hull?

Aristotle thought the earth was stationary and that the sun, the moon, the planets, and the stars moved in circular orbits about the earth. He believed this because he felt, for mystical reasons, that the earth was the center of the universe, and that circular motion was the most perfect. This idea was elaborated by Ptolemy in the second century A.D. into a complete cosmological model. The earth stood at the center, surrounded by eight spheres that carried the moon, the sun, the stars, and the five planets known at the time, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn (Fig 1.1). The planets themselves moved on smaller circles attached to their respective spheres in order to account for their rather complicated observed paths in the sky. The outermost sphere carried the so-called fixed stars, which always stay in the same positions relative to each other but which rotate together across the sky. What lay beyond the last sphere was never made very clear, but it certainly was not part of mankind’s observable universe.

Ptolemy’s model provided a reasonably accurate system for predicting the positions of heavenly bodies in the sky. But in order to predict these positions correctly, Ptolemy had to make an assumption that the moon followed a path that sometimes brought it twice as close to the earth as at other times. And that meant that the moon ought sometimes to appear twice as big as at other times! Ptolemy recognized this flaw, but nevertheless his model was generally, although not universally, accepted. It was adopted by the Christian church as the picture of the universe that was in accordance with Scripture, for it had the great advantage that it left lots of room outside the sphere of fixed stars for heaven and hell.

A simpler model, however, was proposed in 1514 by a Polish priest, Nicholas Copernicus. (At first, perhaps for fear of being branded a heretic by his church, Copernicus circulated his model anonymously.) His idea was that the sun was stationary at the center and that the earth and the planets moved in circular orbits around the sun. Nearly a century passed before this idea was taken seriously. Then two astronomers–the German, Johannes Kepler, and the Italian, Galileo Galilei–started publicly to support the Copernican theory, despite the fact that the orbits it predicted did not quite match the ones observed. The death blow to the Aristotelian/Ptolemaic theory came in 1609. In that year, Galileo started observing the night sky with a telescope, which had just been invented. When he looked at the planet Jupiter, Galileo found that it was accompanied by several small satellites or moons that orbited around it. This implied that everything did not have to orbit directly around the earth, as Aristotle and Ptolemy had thought. (It was, of course, still possible to believe that the earth was stationary at the center of the universe and that the moons of Jupiter moved on extremely complicated paths around the earth, giving the appearance that they orbited Jupiter. However, Copernicus’s theory was much simpler.) At the same time, Johannes Kepler had modified Copernicus’s theory, suggesting that the planets moved not in circles but in ellipses (an ellipse is an elongated circle). The predictions now finally matched the observations.

As far as Kepler was concerned, elliptical orbits were merely an ad hoc hypothesis, and a rather repugnant one at that, because ellipses were clearly less perfect than circles. H A Brief History of Time 時間簡史 英文原版 [平裝] 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

評分☆☆☆☆☆

值得購買。。。。。。。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

深入淺齣 科學巨匠的傑作 拜讀中

評分☆☆☆☆☆

很不錯的書，包裝好物流快！

評分☆☆☆☆☆

買瞭一個多月，昨天纔收到，書還是很好，印刷精美，紙張太好瞭，有點浪費，國外都是再生紙的，比較輕，這個的紙張白得發亮。就是有點重。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

是新的，封裝完好無損！！棒棒噠！！！

評分☆☆☆☆☆

書很好…給兒子買的…

評分☆☆☆☆☆

買迴來仔細看看，就是挺便宜的但是沒有包裝

評分☆☆☆☆☆

垃圾#，大過年的我懶得摺騰看看這質量！！！真垃圾

評分☆☆☆☆☆

書很好，包裝精美，很喜歡，就是買的時候沒貨，等瞭好久。

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價